Rivermate | Nouvelle-Zélande landscape
Rivermate | Nouvelle-Zélande

Résolution des litiges en Nouvelle-Zélande

649 EURpar employé/mois

Understand employment dispute resolution mechanisms in Nouvelle-Zélande

Updated on April 25, 2025

Navigating employment relationships in New Zealand requires a clear understanding of the legal framework governing workplace rights and obligations. Despite best efforts, disputes can arise, ranging from disagreements over terms and conditions to more complex issues like unfair dismissal or discrimination. Effectively managing these situations is crucial for maintaining a productive and compliant work environment.

New Zealand's employment law system provides structured pathways for resolving disputes, primarily focusing on mediation as the first step, followed by investigation or determination by specialist bodies if mediation is unsuccessful. Employers operating in New Zealand, whether directly or through an Employer of Record, must be familiar with these processes and ensure their practices align with current legislation to mitigate risks and handle issues fairly and lawfully.

Labor Courts and Arbitration Panels

New Zealand's employment dispute resolution system is primarily handled by two specialist bodies: the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) and the Employment Court. These bodies operate under the Employment Relations Act 2000.

The Employment Relations Authority (ERA) is the first port of call for most employment relationship problems that cannot be resolved through mediation. It is an investigative body that makes determinations based on the facts and the law. An ERA Member investigates the facts by hearing from the parties and witnesses, reviewing evidence, and then issues a written determination. The ERA can make various orders, including reinstatement, payment of lost wages, and compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity, and injury to feelings.

The Employment Court is a higher court that hears challenges to ERA determinations and deals with more complex or significant employment law matters, such as cases involving strikes, lockouts, or interpretation of collective agreements. Parties dissatisfied with an ERA determination can challenge it in the Employment Court, which conducts a full hearing (a "de novo" hearing) where evidence is presented again. The Employment Court's decisions can be appealed to the Court of Appeal and, in rare cases, the Supreme Court.

Here is a summary of the key forums:

Forum Role Process
Mediation Services Facilitates voluntary resolution of disputes Confidential meetings with a mediator; non-binding unless agreement reached
Employment Relations Authority (ERA) Investigates and determines unresolved disputes after mediation Investigative hearing; issues binding determinations
Employment Court Hears challenges to ERA determinations; deals with complex cases Full court hearing; issues binding judgments

Compliance Audits and Inspection Procedures

Compliance with New Zealand employment law is overseen by the Labour Inspectorate, a part of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). The Labour Inspectorate is responsible for enforcing minimum employment standards, including minimum wage, holiday pay, leave entitlements, and record-keeping requirements.

The Labour Inspectorate conducts proactive audits and inspections across various industries to ensure employers are meeting their obligations. They also investigate complaints received from employees or the public. Inspections can be announced or unannounced. During an inspection, an inspector may request to see employment agreements, wage and time records, holiday and leave records, and other relevant documents. They can interview employers and employees.

If non-compliance is found, the Labour Inspectorate can take various actions, including:

  • Issuing compliance notices requiring the employer to rectify the breach.
  • Imposing penalties for breaches of minimum standards.
  • Taking enforcement action through the ERA or Employment Court for serious or repeated breaches.

While there isn't a fixed frequency for audits for every business, certain industries or businesses with a history of non-compliance may face more frequent scrutiny. The focus is on ensuring fundamental rights are upheld across the workforce.

Reporting Mechanisms and Whistleblower Protections

Employees in New Zealand have several avenues for reporting workplace issues or non-compliance. The primary mechanisms include:

  • Internal Reporting: Many companies have internal grievance procedures or HR departments where employees can raise concerns.
  • Union Representation: Employees who are union members can report issues to their union representative, who can assist in resolving the matter.
  • Labour Inspectorate: Employees can report breaches of minimum employment standards directly to the Labour Inspectorate via phone or online.
  • Health and Safety Regulator (WorkSafe NZ): For issues related to workplace health and safety, reports can be made to WorkSafe NZ.
  • Human Rights Commission: For issues related to discrimination or harassment based on protected attributes.

New Zealand has specific legislation protecting whistleblowers. The Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022 provides a framework for workers to report serious wrongdoing within their organisations or in the public sector. The Act outlines who can make a protected disclosure, what constitutes serious wrongdoing, and how disclosures should be made. It also provides protections against retaliatory action for workers who make a protected disclosure in good faith.

Key aspects of the Protected Disclosures Act include:

  • Defining "serious wrongdoing" broadly to include unlawful acts, misuse of public funds, or acts that pose a serious risk to public health, safety, or the environment.
  • Specifying appropriate recipients for disclosures (e.g., internal managers, relevant external authorities).
  • Requiring organisations to have internal procedures for receiving and dealing with protected disclosures.
  • Prohibiting detrimental conduct against a worker because they have made a protected disclosure.

International Labor Standards Compliance

New Zealand is a member of the International Labour Organization (ILO) and has ratified numerous ILO conventions. While international conventions do not automatically become domestic law, they influence the development and interpretation of New Zealand's employment legislation and policy.

New Zealand's employment law framework is generally considered to align well with core international labor standards, particularly concerning fundamental principles and rights at work, such as freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining, the elimination of forced labor, the abolition of child labor, and the elimination of discrimination in employment.

Compliance with international standards is often reflected in domestic laws covering areas like:

  • Minimum age for employment.
  • Working hours and rest periods.
  • Health and safety standards.
  • Equal pay and non-discrimination.
  • Rights of migrant workers.

Employers operating in New Zealand are primarily bound by domestic law, but awareness of international standards provides context and reinforces the principles underlying local legislation.

Common Employment Disputes and Resolutions

Employment disputes in New Zealand can arise from various issues. Some of the most common include:

  • Unjustified Dismissal: Where an employee believes their dismissal was unfair or unreasonable.
  • Unjustified Disadvantage: Where an employee believes their employment has been negatively affected by the employer's actions (e.g., changes to terms, bullying, lack of support).
  • Wage and Holiday Pay Claims: Disputes over correct payment of wages, minimum wage, holiday pay, or other entitlements.
  • Discrimination and Harassment: Issues related to unlawful discrimination based on protected attributes or workplace harassment.
  • Redundancy: Disputes over the genuine nature of a redundancy situation or the fairness of the process followed.

The standard pathway for resolving these disputes is:

  1. Direct Discussion: Parties are encouraged to try and resolve the issue themselves first.
  2. Mediation: If direct discussion fails, either party can request free mediation services from MBIE. Mediation is confidential and aims for a mutually agreed settlement.
  3. Employment Relations Authority (ERA): If mediation is unsuccessful, the dispute can be referred to the ERA for investigation and determination.
  4. Employment Court: Challenges to ERA determinations or complex cases are heard by the Employment Court.

Legal remedies available depend on the nature of the dispute and the findings of the ERA or Court. These can include:

  • Reinstatement: Ordering the employer to give the employee their job back.
  • Compensation: Payment for lost wages and/or compensation for hurt and humiliation.
  • Pecuniary Penalties: Fines imposed for breaches of employment law.
  • Compliance Orders: Orders requiring the employer to take specific actions to comply with the law.

Understanding these common issues and the established resolution processes is vital for employers to manage their workforce effectively and comply with New Zealand law.

Martijn
Daan
Harvey

Prêt à étendre votre équipe globale ?

Parlez à un expert