
Taxation and Compliance
Everything Employers Need to Know About W-forms
Confused about W-forms? Learn everything employers need to know about W-2s, W-4s, W-9s, and compliance to avoid costly tax mistakes.
Lucas Botzen
Global Employment Guides
17 mins read



Our Employer of Record (EOR) solution makes it easy to hire, pay, and manage global employees.
Book a demoTL;DR:
Hiring global talent used to mean one thing: opening a local entity or limiting yourself to domestic employees. Today, companies have more choices than ever, including working with international contractors or hiring through an Employer of Record (EOR).
At the same time, global talent access is no longer restricted to enterprise giants. As Harvard Business Review notes, regions with deep talent pools—like India’s over five million software engineers—were once only within reach of large multinationals with local legal infrastructure.
That’s no longer the case. Employer of record platforms now allow startups and mid-sized companies to hire skilled workers anywhere in the world, without opening foreign subsidiaries.
But more choice means more complexity.
Contractor misclassification penalties are rising. Labor laws vary sharply by country. And what works for a two-month freelance project might fall apart when you need a full-time designer in Brazil or a product lead in France.
These aren’t just compliance questions. They shape how fast you can scale, how much risk you take on, and how much overhead you’re prepared to manage.
We’ll walk you through how EORs and international contractors compare, what each model offers, and when each makes sense for your team’s growth stage. By the end, you’ll have a clear framework to decide what’s best for your global hiring goals and how to do it safely.
An employer of record (EOR) is a third-party organization that legally employs workers on your behalf in foreign countries. You manage day-to-day work and responsibilities, but the EOR becomes the official employer for legal, tax, and compliance purposes.
That means the EOR handles:
For companies without a local legal entity, or those not ready to invest months and thousands in setting one up, an EOR makes it possible to hire full-time employees quickly and compliantly in multiple countries.
Hiring someone abroad directly, without a registered entity or EOR, can expose your business to permanent establishment (PE) risk. That means local tax authorities may view your company as operating in-country, triggering corporate income tax obligations, regulatory filings, and compliance liabilities. An EOR shields you from this risk by acting as the legal employer on record, keeping your operations clean and defensible.
Say your U.S.-based startup wants to hire a full-time engineer in Germany. Without an EOR, you’d need to register a GmbH, open a local bank account, and learn German employment law. With an EOR, the engineer is legally employed through the EOR’s local entity, while you maintain full operational control. Payroll, benefits, taxes, and legal updates are all handled for you.
According to the Upwork Research Institute’s 2025 study, 28% of skilled knowledge workers now operate as independent professionals, prioritizing autonomy, continuous learning, and higher earning potential. That number is growing, especially among Gen Z and workers in fast-evolving fields like AI and sustainability. In 2024 alone, freelancers generated $1.5 trillion in earnings, often outpacing the salaries of their full-time counterparts.
An independent contractor, essentially, is a self-employed individual or business who provides services under a commercial agreement rather than an employment contract. Contractors are not on your payroll, don’t receive statutory benefits, and are generally responsible for their own taxes, insurance, and business compliance.
When you hire a contractor, you’re engaging them for a specific scope of work. There’s usually more flexibility: no formal working hours, fewer obligations on either side, and limited long-term commitment.
That flexibility is part of the appeal, but it also limits what you can ask for. Most countries have strict rules to distinguish between contractors and employees. If you control a contractor’s schedule, tools, and deliverables too closely, you may cross the line into what local regulators consider “disguised employment.”
You might hire a designer in the Philippines to revamp your brand assets on a six-week project. You agree on deliverables, milestones, and a flat rate. They use their own tools, manage their own schedule, and invoice you at the end. That’s a typical international contractor arrangement, and it works well when you’re not looking to embed someone long-term into your team.
An Agent of Record (AoR)—also referred to as a Contractor of Record (CoR)—is a third-party service that helps companies compliantly engage international contractors by taking on the administrative and legal responsibilities tied to contractor classification.
When working with contractors abroad, companies often face significant risks: local tax authorities may determine that a contractor is actually functioning as an employee, triggering fines, back taxes, and legal exposure. A CoR helps reduce that risk by managing contracts, verifying classification against local laws, and handling payments in a way that aligns with jurisdictional requirements.
A CoR offers a middle ground between do-it-yourself contractor hiring and full employment via an EOR.
EOR and contractor models serve different business needs, but the differences go beyond just cost and contract terms. The legal structure, compliance exposure, and level of control you have all shift depending on how the individual is classified.
| Aspect | Employer of Record (EOR) | Contractor of Record (CoR) | Direct Contractor Hiring |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal classification | Employee, hired through EOR’s local entity | Independent contractor, engaged via compliant third-party structure | Self-employed; engaged directly under a commercial contract |
| Compliance responsibility | EOR is the legal employer. Handles payroll, tax, benefits, and labor compliance. | CoR manages contracts, classification checks, and contractor tax obligations. | Your company is exposed to misclassification risk and compliance gaps. |
| Contract structure | Local employment contract with statutory protections | Commercial agreement tailored to local contractor laws | Standard freelance agreement (varies in enforceability and accuracy) |
| Control and oversight | High control: set hours, define tools, supervise performance | Moderate control: must remain within contractor classification boundaries | Low control: contractor sets terms, tools, and schedule |
| Benefits and entitlements | Statutory benefits (e.g., paid leave, healthcare, pension); optional add-ons | No statutory benefits, but some perks may be offered contractually | None required; benefits typically not provided |
| Payments and taxes | EOR handles payroll, tax withholdings, employer contributions | CoR coordinates gross payments and tax documentation in local currencies | You pay a gross invoice; contractor handles own taxes. May result in regulatory risk |
| Onboarding and admin | Fully managed: EOR handles documentation, compliance, and setup | Streamlined: onboarding portal, ID checks, and payment setup handled by CoR | Manual: contracts, payments, and onboarding must be handled in-house |
| Risk of misclassification | Very low—EOR assumes legal liability, backed by local legal teams and SLAs | Moderate—risk mitigated through classification controls and local contract compliance | High—risk increases if contractor behaves like an employee without proper documentation |
| Best fit for | Long-term, full-time roles that require structure, control, and retention | Ongoing contractor engagements that require operational visibility and legal clarity | Short-term, project-based work with minimal oversight and low compliance sensitivity |
Caption: A comparison of the employer of record and contractor of record models
Misclassifying someone as a contractor when they legally qualify as an employee can expose your company to significant penalties, including back taxes, social contributions, legal fees, and reputational damage.
For example, in July 2025, a Virginia-based janitorial franchisor, CleanNet USA, agreed to pay $1.7 million in penalties and restitution to settle claims it misclassified workers in California as independent contractors. The agreement addresses allegations that franchisees underpaid cleaning staff by denying them protections guaranteed to employees under California labor law, including minimum wage and overtime.
Many companies assume contractor arrangements are “safer” because they don’t involve payroll or benefits. But in practice, labor authorities in countries like the UK, Germany, France, Brazil, and South Korea take classification violations seriously and increasingly pursue foreign employers.
Misclassification audits can be triggered by local tax authorities, whistleblowing, visa processing, or even routine bank verifications.
You may be at risk of misclassification if your contractor:
If you're hiring globally at scale, the risk compounds fast, especially if you’re relying on contractors who behave more like embedded team members.
There’s no single right model, just the right fit for your goals, timeline, and compliance risk appetite. Here's how startups and scaling companies typically decide between an Employer of Record and an international contractor engagement.
Use an EOR if:
Examples:
Use a contractor and CoR solution if:
Examples:
Cost is often the first reason companies lean toward contractor hiring, but it's important to view expenses holistically. The total cost of employment isn’t just about monthly fees or invoices. It includes compliance protection, administrative workload, and future risk.
Here’s a breakdown of how the two models compare on cost:
| Cost Element | Employer of Record (EOR) | Contractor of Record (CoR) | Direct Contractor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly base compensation | Gross salary agreed with employee; paid to EOR, who remits salary & statutory costs | Invoice amount as per contractor agreement paid to CoR, who pays contractor | Invoice amount set by contractor and paid directly to contractor |
| Platform fees | Typically $200–$700 per month per employee | Usually $29–$227/month per contractor. Rivermate’s pricing is approx. $227 per month per contractor based on current exchange rates. | None (unless using a third-party payment processor or platform like Stripe or Wise) |
| Statutory contributions | Included or transparently itemized in EOR billing; covers employer taxes, pension, social insurance, etc. | Not required for contractors; CoR ensures tax classification is handled correctly | Contractor files and pays own taxes; employer at risk for misclassification if obligations are not met |
| Benefits (healthcare, etc.) | Many EORs include local statutory benefits; extra benefits possible for a fee, vary by provider/country | Not included by default; can be added to contract at client’s discretion | Not included; contractors are responsible for their own coverage |
| Payment processing | Included by EOR: payroll, local tax, compliance, FX conversion | Handled by CoR in local currency; foreign exchange and payment infrastructure included | Employer/client arranges payment; may incur FX and international wire fees, delays, and markups |
| Misclassification risk cost | Covered: EOR provides legal/HR compliance & indemnification, assumes risk | Reduced: CoR manages contracts, monitors classification, but some risk remains for non-compliance | High: Employer is legally liable for misclassification, subject to back taxes, fines, and legal actions |
Caption: Comparison of costs for EOR, CoR, and direct contractor hiring
Deciding between an EOR and a contractor model comes down to how you plan to engage global talent and what level of oversight, compliance, and commitment your business requires.
If you’re hiring someone full-time, want control over their schedule and tools, or expect them to represent your company in a long-term capacity, an employer of record is typically the safer and more scalable option. It gives you a clear legal structure, built-in protections, and the ability to offer benefits and a consistent experience, without opening a local entity.
On the other hand, if you’re working with someone on a short-term or clearly defined project where they operate independently and set their own hours, hiring international contractors may be sufficient. This route can offer more flexibility and lower upfront cost, but comes with limitations and greater classification risk if misused.
Ultimately, it’s not about choosing one model forever. Many companies use a mix of both: contractors for project-based roles, an employer of record for key team members abroad. The right path depends on the role, the region, and your appetite for risk.
Whether you’re onboarding a full-time employee in Germany or paying a freelance developer in Argentina, Rivermate gives you the structure to do it right, without getting buried in compliance paperwork or legal ambiguity.
Rivermate acts as the legal employer on your behalf in 150+ countries. You maintain full control over the work while Rivermate:
Rivermate’s CoR service helps you work with global freelancers without risking misclassification. We:
It’s all managed in one place, whether you're hiring a single remote engineer or scaling a blended workforce across 10 countries.
Case study: how Boloo retained key talent abroad with Rivermate
Boloo, a fast-growing e-commerce company founded by Skah van Bijnen, faced a challenge when one of its top developers relocated to Hungary. The team was determined to keep this critical employee but didn’t have the legal or operational setup to support international employment. They needed a compliant, efficient solution to retain the developer without the burden of establishing a local entity.
Why Rivermate
After evaluating their options, Boloo partnered with Rivermate as their Employer of Record (EOR).
What stood out
Results
Hiring internationally opens the door to incredible talent but also to real legal and operational complexity. Choosing between an employer of record and an international contractor isn’t just about budget. It’s about the kind of relationship you want to build with your team and the level of compliance protection you need.
For short-term, flexible projects, contractors still make sense. But when you’re hiring full-time contributors, want to offer benefits, or need consistency across countries, an EOR gives you the infrastructure to grow globally without taking on unnecessary risk.
Rivermate supports both models, so you can hire the way your business needs, without compromise. Our platform combines legal coverage, local payroll execution, and real human support in 150+ countries.
Whether you're ready to hire tomorrow or still comparing options, our team can walk you through the best setup for your team.
Book a 30-minute consultation with us to explore your options.
What is the difference between contractor of record and employer of record?
A Contractor of Record (CoR) helps you compliantly engage independent contractors. An Employer of Record (EOR) becomes the legal employer for full-time staff abroad, handling payroll, taxes, and compliance.
What is the difference between an employer and a contractor?
An employer manages and directs workers and is responsible for their benefits and taxes. Contractors work independently, typically for multiple clients, and are not managed day to day.
What are the benefits of an employer of record compared to a contractor?
An EOR reduces compliance risk, simplifies payroll, enables benefits, and provides a consistent employee experience across countries, especially important for long-term hires.

Lucas Botzen is the founder of Rivermate, a global HR platform specializing in international payroll, compliance, and benefits management for remote companies. He previously co-founded and successfully exited Boloo, scaling it to over €2 million in annual revenue. Lucas is passionate about technology, automation, and remote work, advocating for innovative digital solutions that streamline global employment.


Our Employer of Record (EOR) solution makes it easy to hire, pay, and manage global employees.
Book a demo
Taxation and Compliance
Confused about W-forms? Learn everything employers need to know about W-2s, W-4s, W-9s, and compliance to avoid costly tax mistakes.
Lucas Botzen

Taxation and Compliance
Discover how to manage payroll for remote teams, align cycles, and navigate pay schedules with global compliance for timely, accurate payments.
Lucas Botzen

Taxation and Compliance
Learn to manage tax compliance for remote teams, covering permanent establishment risks, tax treaties, and payroll systems in this practical guide.
Lucas Botzen