Understand the key elements of employment contracts in Chile
In Chile, the most common type of employment contract is the Indefinite-Term Employment Contract. This contract offers ongoing employment with no predetermined end date, providing greater job security for the employee. Termination can occur by mutual agreement or by following the legal dismissal procedures outlined in the Chilean Labor Code. These procedures involve providing notice periods based on employee seniority.
A Fixed-Term Employment Contract specifies a predetermined start and end date for the employment relationship. These contracts are suitable for temporary positions, project-based work, or seasonal needs. The maximum duration of a fixed-term contract is typically one year, with the possibility of renewal for one additional year under specific circumstances. Exceptions exist for highly skilled professionals, where the maximum duration can be two years for the initial contract. Early termination before the expiry date usually requires a valid justification and adherence to notice periods.
A Part-Time Employment Contract is for employees working less than the standard full-time working hours. Part-time work can be beneficial for both employers seeking flexible staffing solutions and employees seeking reduced work schedules. Part-time employees enjoy the same rights and benefits as full-time employees on a pro-rated basis, including minimum wage, social security contributions, and vacation time. The specific working hours per week or day should be clearly outlined in the contract.
Chilean labor law also recognizes special employment contracts for specific situations. These include the Piecework Contract, where payment is based on the amount of work completed rather than a set hourly rate. The Seasonal Worker Contract is for temporary work tied to specific seasons. The Fixed-Term Contract for Public Works is used for construction projects with a predetermined timeframe.
Chilean labor law requires certain clauses in all employment contracts to ensure clarity and protection for both employers and employees.
The mandatory clauses include:
While not mandatory, including additional clauses can enhance clarity and manage expectations:
In Chile, labor law does not recognize a formal probationary period within an employment contract, meaning employers cannot terminate an employee's contract based solely on performance during a trial period. However, an alternative practice has emerged to address the need for an initial evaluation phase.
Companies in Chile frequently utilize fixed-term contracts, with a maximum duration of 12 months, to assess new hires. During this time, employers can evaluate an employee's skills, fit within the company culture, and overall performance.
This approach offers employers flexibility in making permanent hiring decisions after the fixed term concludes. However, it's crucial to ensure the fixed-term contract genuinely reflects a temporary need, not simply a disguised probationary period. Chilean law may consider repeated fixed-term contracts for the same role with the same employee to be an indefinite contract.
In Chilean employment agreements, clauses can be included to protect an employer's confidential information and competitive advantage. However, the enforceability of these clauses is shaped by specific legal considerations.
Confidentiality clauses are recognized and enforceable in Chile. They allow employers to safeguard sensitive information, such as trade secrets, customer lists, or proprietary formulas, from unauthorized disclosure by employees.
The information protected under a confidentiality clause must be clearly defined and considered a legitimate business secret. Clauses that are overly broad, restricting an employee's ability to use general knowledge or skills, are unlikely to be upheld in court.
Unlike confidentiality clauses, non-compete clauses in Chile face stricter limitations. While not explicitly prohibited, their enforceability hinges on meeting specific criteria established by courts:
Meeting these criteria enhances the likelihood of a non-compete clause being upheld in court. However, even if these conditions are met, enforcing such clauses can be challenging, and courts may still consider them an undue restriction on an employee's right to work.
We're here to help you on your global hiring journey.