What is the Big Quit
The Big Quit, also known as The Great Resignation, marks a notable rise in voluntary employee departures, especially in the United States, starting around April 2021. This trend arose from the societal and economic upheaval caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It reflects a wider rethinking of work, life priorities, and employee expectations across industries.
Initially a U.S. phenomenon, the trend has spread globally. It has changed employer-employee relationships, increased demand for remote work and flexibility, and sped up changes in talent retention, pay strategies, and workforce design.
What Were the Causes of the Big Quit?
Several linked factors led to the mass resignations during this time. Each shows deeper issues in modern employment practices.
A key driver was a collective reassessment of work-life balance. The pandemic disrupted usual office routines. Workers had time to reflect on their well-being, values, and priorities. Many began to prefer flexible work and sought employers offering location independence, asynchronous communication, and control over their schedules.
The rise of remote-first companies during the pandemic set new expectations for flexibility. Employees who adapted to working from home were hesitant to return to the office, especially without strong incentives or safety assurances. Employers who insisted on in-person attendance faced higher turnover rates.
Stagnant wages, coupled with rising inflation and cost of living adjustments (COLA), added to the dissatisfaction. Many workers, especially in frontline, retail, and hospitality jobs, realized their pay didn’t match the risks or workloads they faced during the pandemic. This wage dissatisfaction led to job changes and demands for salary benchmarking.
Chronic job dissatisfaction, previously masked by economic uncertainty, also resurfaced as labor markets stabilized. Workers who felt undervalued found new confidence to resign and seek better opportunities, often in industries with more employee-friendly cultures and growth options.
Health and safety concerns were crucial, too. For those in in-person roles, especially where safety measures were seen as inadequate, returning to physical offices felt risky. Seeking safer, more stable jobs became a reasonable response to rigid workplace policies.
How Did Some Companies Retain Their Staff During the Big Quit?
To tackle the labor disruptions from the Big Quit, companies had to rethink how they attract, support, and keep talent. The most successful firms embraced agility and employee well-being in their strategies.
One effective response was adopting flexible work models. Offering hybrid workspace options, permanent remote work setups, or adjustable schedules helped meet employees’ expectations post-pandemic. When workers manage their time and environment, productivity and satisfaction tend to rise.
Equally vital was ensuring that base salary and overall compensation management stayed competitive and clear. Organizations that adjusted pay structures to align with industry standards and inflation were better at keeping key talent. Benefits like mental health resources, on-demand pay, and enhanced employee assistance programs (EAPs) also became crucial for retention.
Creating a positive, inclusive, and values-driven work culture was another key retention strategy. When employees feel recognized, trusted, and aligned with the organization’s mission, they are more likely to stay. Employers who invested in career path development, internal mobility, and skill-building fostered a sense of belonging and long-term potential.
Listening to employee feedback through engagement surveys, eNPS scores (Employee Net Promoter Score), and exit interviews offered real-time insights into changing workforce needs. By quickly addressing concerns about burnout, workload, or unfair treatment, companies showed accountability and responsiveness—essential traits in today’s employer branding.
Broader Implications of the Big Quit
The Big Quit has significantly changed how work is structured and viewed. It challenged the dominance of office-centric models and sped up the use of HR tech tools, such as cloud-based HR software and HRIS platforms that support distributed and hybrid workforces.
It also underscored the importance of employee lifetime value—the long-term benefits of investing in employees from recruitment to retention. Companies that quickly adapted to meet changing expectations gained an edge in reputation and resilience.
On a larger economic scale, the Big Quit sparked discussions about labor market participation, workforce shortages, and the need for sustainable and humane employment policies. Governments, businesses, and thought leaders now recognise that talent mobility, worker empowerment, and future of work concepts are crucial for organizational sustainability.
Conclusion
The Big Quit is a significant labor market event marked by widespread voluntary resignations and shifting employee expectations. Driven by a mix of social, economic, and cultural factors, it has redefined how we work, lead, and thrive in a post-pandemic world.
For organizations, the lessons from the Big Quit go beyond quick fixes. They call for a long-term change in people management, workplace flexibility, compensation fairness, and leadership accountability. Those who adapt and focus on employee experience will build resilient, committed, and future-ready teams.
For definitions of key HR and employment terms, visit the Rivermate Glossary.