Understand the key elements of employment contracts in Nepal
In Nepal, the Labor Act of 2017 (2074 BS) defines various types of employment agreements that can be established between employers and employees. These distinctions are crucial for both parties when entering into an employment contract.
Regular employment is the most common type of employment agreement. It offers an indefinite term with no specific end date and applies to positions where the employer requires ongoing work from the employee.
Work-based employment is suitable for specific tasks or projects. The employment terminates upon completion of the designated work.
Time-bound employment has a predetermined end date, established at the outset of the contract. It's suitable for temporary projects or seasonal positions.
Casual employment is for short-term work, typically not exceeding seven days in a month. Casual employees generally receive fewer benefits compared to other employment categories.
Part-time employment involves working less than 35 hours per week. Part-time employees are entitled to most benefits on a pro-rata basis compared to full-time employees.
While not explicitly mentioned in the Act, fixed-term agreements can be established within the Time-Bound Employment category. These typically involve renewing the contract upon mutual agreement if both parties wish to continue the employment relationship.
Most employment agreements, irrespective of the type, include a probationary period. This initial period allows for assessment of both the employee's suitability for the role and the employer's expectations. The duration of the probationary period is generally determined by the employer but should be outlined in the employment contract.
Employment agreements in Nepal act as a legal framework governing the relationship between employers and employees. The Labor Act of 2017 (2074 BS) establishes minimum requirements for these agreements.
The Labor Act of 2017 (2074) in Nepal provides guidelines for probationary periods within employment agreements. This period is a crucial part of the employment contract, allowing employers to assess an employee's suitability for the role.
According to the Act, the maximum probationary period is six months. This clause can be included in an employment contract by employers.
During the probation period, the employer has the right to terminate the employment at any time without providing advanced notice. This provision offers a flexible assessment window to determine if the employee meets the job expectations.
If the employer does not terminate the employment within the six-month probationary period, the employment contract automatically becomes valid. Consequently, the employee gains rights and protections under the Labor Act.
For Employers, while the probation period offers flexibility in assessing new hires, it's crucial to provide adequate training, support, and clear performance expectations during this time.
For Employees, understanding the terms of the probationary period beforehand is essential. Employees should actively seek feedback and demonstrate their capabilities to secure permanent employment after the probationary period.
Employment agreements in Nepal often incorporate clauses to protect the employer's confidential information and restrict competition from former employees. These clauses and their legal framework are essential to understand.
Confidentiality clauses in Nepali employment contracts safeguard the employer's trade secrets and proprietary information. While the Labor Act doesn't explicitly address confidentiality, legal principles support its enforceability through contract law. These clauses typically restrict employees from disclosing confidential information, such as customer lists, business plans and strategies, unreleased product details, and financial information. The scope of confidential information should be clearly defined within the agreement.
The information protected should be demonstrably confidential and essential to the employer's business. Overly broad restrictions may be unenforceable. Additionally, the clause shouldn't prevent employees from fulfilling their job duties or disclosing information required by law.
Non-compete clauses aim to limit an employee's ability to work for a competitor after leaving the company. While these clauses are included in Nepali employment agreements, their enforceability is less certain compared to confidentiality clauses.
The courts tend to view non-compete clauses with greater scrutiny, considering factors like the employee's position, geographic scope, and duration of restriction. Senior employees with access to sensitive information may face more enforceable restrictions than lower-level employees. Unreasonable geographic limitations on where a former employee can work might be deemed unenforceable. The period of non-competition should be reasonable and proportionate to the legitimate interests of the employer.
We're here to help you on your global hiring journey.